Here are a couple of emails we received that were flagged with BADHEADERs but are valid subscriptions...anything appear out of order?
======================================================== Received: from mail.yourdictionary.com [206.14.214.45] by vwc.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A3E8A3D04EA; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 07:15:52 -0400 Received: from www.yourdictionary.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.yourdictionary.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id EAA15341 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 04:10:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 04:10:13 -0700 (PDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: SPAM[BADHEADERS, REVDNS, WEIGHT10-Df3e84ea.SMD]: SPENDTHRIFT: Your word of the day from www.yourdictionary.com Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------34A16551A25CD517ED17D8FD" X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a mail server 206.14.214.45 with no reverse DNS entry. X-Declude-Spoolname: Df3e84ea.SMD X-Note: This E-mail was sent from [No Reverse DNS] ([206.14.214.45]). X-Spam-Tests-Failed: BADHEADERS, REVDNS, WEIGHT10 X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-UIDL: 324911420 Status: U ======================================================== Received: from 66.77.70.173 [66.77.70.135] by acsfla.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id AC6214780066; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 06:43:46 -0400 Received: from insp02 (10.0.12.19) by 66.77.70.173 (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 6:35:00 -0400 Message-ID: <3294487.1025175475609.JavaMail.Administrator@insp02> From: "Verizon MerchantMatch from SuperPages.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Verizon MerchantMatch from SuperPages.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SPAM[BADHEADERS-Dec62066.SMD]: Daily Lead Summary Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable _Respond-Tag-Environment-CD: 6 X-Declude-Spoolname: Dec62066.SMD X-Note: This E-mail was sent from fw01.res.iad.qwest.net. ([66.77.70.135]). X-Spam-Tests-Failed: BADHEADERS X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 06:43:48 -0400 X-UIDL: 324911416 Status: U ======================================================== Thanks, Darin. ----- Original Message ----- From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:13 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there a feature list for the JunkMail beta? Fw: [Declude.JunkMail] New filter test > > >The main problem we're seeing is false positives on SPAMHEADERS, BADHEADERS... > > Just a reminder here -- > > Although the SPAMHEADERS test will have quite a few false positives (mainly > from poorly designed websites, but the false positives go down a lot by > using the new LOOSENSPAMHEADERS ON setting in the latest beta), the > BADHEADERS test will never catch any legitimate mail unless it is sent from > a broken mail client. So the BADHEADERS test is usually good to use either > on its own or in a weighting system. > > >BTW, any interest in adding email categorization (based on content) or > >summarization algorithm? > > Now that would be an interesting idea. > -Scott > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web > site at http://www.declude.com . > --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
