Interesting...thanks, Scott. Darin. ----- Original Message ----- From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 5:03 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there a feature list for the JunkMail beta? Fw: [Declude.JunkMail] New filter test
> > >Here are a couple of emails we received that were flagged with BADHEADERs > >but are valid subscriptions...anything appear out of order? > > Before looking at it, I can say "Yes, something is out of order." :) > > >Received: from mail.yourdictionary.com [206.14.214.45] by vwc.net with ESMTP > > (SMTPD32-6.06) id A3E8A3D04EA; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 07:15:52 -0400 > >Received: from www.yourdictionary.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > > by mail.yourdictionary.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id EAA15341 > > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 04:10:13 -0700 (PDT) > >Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 04:10:13 -0700 (PDT) > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: SPAM[BADHEADERS, REVDNS, WEIGHT10-Df3e84ea.SMD]: SPENDTHRIFT: Your > >word of the day from www.yourdictionary.com > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Precedence: list > >MIME-Version: 1.0 > >Content-Type: multipart/mixed; > > boundary="------------34A16551A25CD517ED17D8FD" > > Without the code that Declude JunkMail uses for the BADHEADERS test (from > the WARN action or the Declude JunkMail log file), I can't say with 100% > certainty what the problem is. However, it looks like the problem is that > it is missing the To: header, which is required. > > >Received: from 66.77.70.173 [66.77.70.135] by acsfla.com with ESMTP > > (SMTPD32-6.06) id AC6214780066; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 06:43:46 -0400 > >Received: from insp02 (10.0.12.19) by 66.77.70.173 (LSMTP for Windows NT > > v1.1b) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 > > 6:35:00 -0400 > >Message-ID: <3294487.1025175475609.JavaMail.Administrator@insp02> > >From: "Verizon MerchantMatch from SuperPages.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: "Verizon MerchantMatch from SuperPages.com" > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: SPAM[BADHEADERS-Dec62066.SMD]: Daily Lead Summary > >Mime-Version: 1.0 > >Content-Type: text/html > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >_Respond-Tag-Environment-CD: 6 > > This one is missing the Date: header, which is also a required > header. This one is worse than the missing To: header (which is just a > technical violation), as this one will cause a lot of the E-mail to > "disappear" in people's inboxes, as the mail client has no idea when this > E-mail was originally sent. > -Scott > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web > site at http://www.declude.com . > --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
