BTW, what is the new link for interims ?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 7:33 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim > hehe...he said "do do". > > Understood on old features...just saying that was fixed previously (thus > contained in the newest interim) *and* including the number of the latest > interim will go a long ways. > > Darin. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 3:18 PM > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim > > > > >"Please understand that I hold you in the highest regard..."...<grin> > > > >Surely you know which interim you have available when you post to the list > >that something is added or fixed in the latest interim? > > I can say that the latest interim is 1.79i7. But that won't help someone > who is running 1.79i3 in this case, because they don't know if the new > feature was added before or after 1.79i3. > > >I think what Markus is asking here is just that when you post that > something > >is fixed in the latest interim to also include the number that indicates > >what the latest interim is. > > That I do do, most of the time. For example, "That was just fixed in a new > interim 1.79i7". > > However, when referring to *old* features -- ones that were not just added > to the latest interim -- I do not mention which it was, as it could take a > lot of time to find it. > > >This would go a long way to quelling these discussions... > > I doubt these discussions will ever be quelled. :) > > >I think everyone here understands and sincerely appreciates the effort and > >quick response put into the interims, but obviously this confusion and mild > >frustration keeps coming up, so maybe it's time to make a slight > >adaptation... > > If there was a way that worked for everyone, we would. But I don't think > there is such a way. Different people are asking for different things > (labelling the current interim version on the website, including the > version number in posts for new features (which is normally already done), > including the version in posts where the archives already contain the > version needed for the feature, adding the information to the release > notes, etc.). And that's just from *this* go-around. Previous times, > other issues have come up, too. > > -Scott > --- > Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers > since 2000. > Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver > vulnerability detection. > Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation. > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
