On Sep 12, 2006, at 9:49 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:


Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Geir,

On Sep 12, 2006, at 3:37 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:

I read Rick's note on the 10.2 licensing issue in an archive because of
strange move to the user list, so sorry for the weird quoting :

This issue affects users of Derby just as much as developers. Users
counting on a production release of Derby to be used with a production
version of JDK6 with JDBC4 are directly affected by this change.

Isn't that the case with every aspect of development?

Nah.

Users care about their bugs and the features that they use, and the schedule for the next production release. The topic of discussion is about the schedule for the next production release.

It was a judgement call, and I think it was the right one. Should we have a vote? ;-)

Craig

geir


Craig

Craig Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://db.apache.org/jdo



Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to