On Tue, 2019-01-15 at 10:58 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 15/01/2019 10:48, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 14:22 +0100, Carlos Soriano wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > > > It has been a few months since we moved to GitLab. Apart of > > > spurious > > > issues, specific annoyances and frustrations, seems it has been > > > generally good. I would like to gather some general feeling about > > > it. > > > Things that really made a constant impact to you and your work, > > > both > > > bad or good. Feel free to provide feedback about the transition > > > or > > > the administration of GitLab instance too. Free form. > > > > > > Please keep the mail chain one way from you towards the world, so > > > we > > > don't get trapped on specifics, we can address stuff raised here > > > individually out of list. Personally, I'll ping you on IRC or so > > > if I > > > can do something to help. > > > > > > Of course, feel free to msg me directly on IRC/email too. > > > > My main problem is/was that contributing by pushing a branch is > > super- > > easy, but you can't contribute by pushing a branch if you're not > > allowed to push a branch. So this isn't a problem when you're in > > @GNOME, and the project is as well, but I've not bothered pushing > > small > > fixes to non-GNOME group modules. > > It should still be easy to fork the project, push a branch to your > namespace, > and then submit a MR. Or did I misunderstand?
Too many trips to the web browser, too many re-clones of the repo (or esoteric git command-lines), and too many left-over repos in your own namespace. It's a problem I have with github as well, it's the same workflow. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
