On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 5:54 AM Emmanuele Bassi via desktop-devel-list <
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org> wrote:

> The release team can do "non maintainer" releases, of course; the problem
> is, of course, that maintainers can be *very* protective of their fiefdoms,
> so the release team has to wait for either being explicitly asked to do a
> release, or for an answer from maintainers as to whether they'll be able to
> do a release. We *cannot* have it both ways: either the release team can
> take over your project for a specific task—do a release, keep the build
> running—or we have to wait until we get an answer from the maintainer.
>

The ideas about automating releases mentioned elsewhere in the thread sound
like great time-savers, but I primarily came here to add to what Emmanuele
said: I'd be quite happy for the release team to have the power to take
over releasing my module if I forget, but I've seen some astonishing
vitriol directed at the release team on this very mailing list when they
have done similar things in the past. I wouldn't blame them if they didn't
even want to get near this topic.

As a community, if we weight the autonomy of maintainers so heavily that
we're willing to tolerate mailing list flames about it, then we don't also
get to complain when nobody steps in to help with maintainers' tasks.

Cheers,
-- 
Philip
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to