On Monday 13 February 2006 19:10, Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 10:52 +0000, Nick Kew wrote: > > FWIW, we have an uncommitted patch that looks like this. > > Feel free to improve it. > > Thanks. I'll work on the underlying drivers in order to get this going.
It'll have to wait for 1.3, 'cos it affects the API (despite not breaking anything:-) > Any comments in relation to apr_dbd_init situation (my other e-mail)? I think we should fix it by calling apr_dbd_init from apr_initialize. I guess that didn't happen originally 'cos of the sequencing of when things were developed and committed, and karma. -- Nick Kew
