On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote:
> Check for ebcdic? Are we *really* going to continue support for that? > Seriously, folks. What is the better criteria? * offends sensibility of at least one APR contributor * actively used by and depended on by multiple APR contributors (and may be a partial sponsor of the warm, dry environment necessary for APR hacking, though that's probably a difficult determination to make for certain)
