On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 13:24, Jeff Trawick <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Check for ebcdic? Are we *really* going to continue support for that? >> Seriously, folks. > > What is the better criteria? > * offends sensibility of at least one APR contributor > * actively used by and depended on by multiple APR contributors (and may be > a partial sponsor of the warm, dry environment necessary for APR hacking, > though that's probably a difficult determination to make for certain)
If it is still being used, then... well, geez. *shudder* And in response to your question, "duh. not like I have any super-vote here. just opening a discussion." Cheers, -g
