On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 14:41, Jeff Trawick <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 13:24, Jeff Trawick <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Check for ebcdic? Are we *really* going to continue support for that? >> >> Seriously, folks. >> > >> > What is the better criteria? >> > * offends sensibility of at least one APR contributor >> > * actively used by and depended on by multiple APR contributors (and may >> > be >> > a partial sponsor of the warm, dry environment necessary for APR >> > hacking, >> > though that's probably a difficult determination to make for certain) >> >> If it is still being used, then... well, geez. *shudder* >> >> And in response to your question, "duh. not like I have any super-vote >> here. just opening a discussion." > > Here's a better opening to such a discussion ;) > > "Hey guys, here are some platforms/nuances/whatever currently in APR that I > think we might be able to drop in 2.0. Which are still being > used/maintained?" ;)
hehehehe.....
