I don't see the confusion at all, as long as the M<n> is preceded by
the final release version (ex. geronimo-2.0-M1).
On Dec 5, 2006, at 1:21 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Should we use M<N>
------------------
Jason posted in another thread about how M<n> (I assume you were
referring to Milestones) might be confusing for post 1.0 releases.
I don't think its confusing as it represents a simple point in time
reference of a work in progress but not a full implementation (I
think that build would more appropriately be a beta). Alpha
release might be appropriate but I'm good with milestone. Other
thoughts?
-sachin
