eh... I think proteinStrand, chimp, frog is soooo much better Matt :-P
I just don't want to start hearing people talking about "m1" and
meaning "2.0-m1" compared to the first m1 of Geronimo.
I'm going to drop this now... my opinion has been noted... and now ye
all shall continue :-)
--jason
On Dec 5, 2006, at 12:35 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
On Dec 5, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Dec 5, 2006, at 11:34 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
I don't see the confusion at all, as long as the M<n> is preceded
by the final release version (ex. geronimo-2.0-M1).
Yes, but already Matt is referring to "M1" with no 2.0 prefix.
Anyways... I don't like it... but I don't have the energy to
debate it.
My bad. I meant 2.0-M1...I'll correct that omission in the
future. I now understand the confusion.
What other suffix do you think would be appropriate? I don't care
if its 2.0-frog1. Following an evolutionary theme we could have:
2.0-proteinStrand
2.0-singleCellOrganism
2.0-fish
2.0-frog
2.0-chimp
2.0-homosapien
2.0
:)
--jason
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
