I'm -1 on releasing as is because of (2). I think our binaries should be cleaner that that :-/

I don't think (1) is significant. There is no functional change from applying the patch from GERONIMO-2941.
(3) also doesn't bother me.

thanks
david jencks

On Apr 3, 2007, at 2:57 AM, Rakesh Midha wrote:

I think we need to look into following issues:
1. Initial startup error caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/ browse/GERONIMO-2941

2. Why is that in console's Application section and deployment list- module, I see all the modules twice? One with the version 2.0-M4, appears as started and one with version 2.0-M4-SNAPSHOT stopped. All the modules also have two folders for two versions. Its not causing any error or exception, but i am just worried as this result in larger size of zip/gz and installed folder, and may also have other effects.

3. Shutdown error.

thanks
Rakesh


On 4/3/07, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
+1

Jacek

On 4/1/07, Matt Hogstrom < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have placed the 2.0-M4 binaries out on http://people.apache.org/
> ~hogstrom/2.0-M4-rc1 for you to take a look at.  (They are uploading
> as I write this).
>
> I have done some testing with DayTrader.  There is an issue in
> connecting with he MDB container which still needs to be worked out
> so the application will not deploy as is.  However, given the scopwe
> of function DayTrader covers as well as all the late code drops I
> don't see an issue with that. Smaller samples should be ok and tests
> look good.  Given that we're in the final stages of testing I'd like
> to get this Milestone on the wire as is and fix issues in trunk.
> Users that pull this binary and report issues will help us in the
> Drive to 5.
>
> Other than that limitation I think this Milestone looks ready to go.
>
> After reviewing the content please cast your vote.
>
> [ ] +1 - Release these binaries
> [ ]   0
> [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries (provide reason)
>
> This vote will conclude on April 4th at 0600 Eastern.
>
> Thanks!
>


--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl


Reply via email to