Steffen wrote: > > > > > Nothing could be further from the truth. > > > > Not so far, from their site: > > Since Covalent maintains close ties with the ASF and employees expert staff > who work on the Apache HTTP project full time as code committers, we are > committed to supporting our customers who use Apache HTTP either standalone > or bundled as part of Covalent Enterprise Ready Server (ERS). > >
"Their" being Covalent, not the ASF. But I don't see how that in any way "proves" your statement that "the ASF and/or Covalent Technologies are not happy with the Apache Lounge" or that "Covalent is trying to protect there(sic) position"... Bill said this himself: he acted as an individual and not with his Covalent hat on at all. Nor with his Apache hat on either. To claim that this is an Apache Lounge vs. "ASF and/or Covalent" issue is clearly not the case. Nor should it be "amazing" to anyone that the ASF has issues with how the Apache logo or name are used. Hate to tell you this, but we've done this to many many others, like IBM, JBoss and yes Covalent. > Steffen > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jim Jagielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <dev@httpd.apache.org> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, 19 August, 2007 17:25 > Subject: Re: Apachelounge has to remove Apachelounge Feather, be warned > > > > > > On Aug 19, 2007, at 5:49 AM, Steffen wrote: > > > >> > >> Correct me if I wrong, but sometimes I have the feeling that ASF and/or > >> Covalent Technologies are not happy with the Apache Lounge. And like Tom > >> said before: sounds a bit more territorial than legal to me. Maybe > >> Covalent Technologies is also trying to protect there position as > >> distributor ? > >> > > > > Nothing could be further from the truth. > > > > > -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
