On 3/28/2012 6:04 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Guys. You were asked a boolean question. I'm pretty sure it was > intended to be taken literally. Have you considered just answering it?
I believe that you meant to direct this to Graham and cc me, and not visa versa, since I don't have such an answer. I also believe he did so (you might also refer to the bugzilla ticket Sam hasn't replied to yet). https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52322 I had a question; Roy introduced a claim that he had, back in the day, confirmed with legal that the process is not applicable for contributions authored by committers, and some other contexts. The "IP Intake Process" (as comfortable as a visit to the Gastroenterologist) needs to be reclaimed by the *legal committee* which has that charge across all PMCs (incubator included), and taken off the hands of the Incubator committee which isn't given jurisdiction over TLPs. That Incubator documentation seems to be inconsistent with the prerequisites as defined by Sam. My question, where is the handling of large code submissions to existing top level projects documented, to satisfy the concerns of legal@? Please reclaim and refine. Are the TLPs accountable to Incubator guidance? I don't see where that was assigned. Thanks for giving some thought to the bigger picture, Daniel and team.
