On 06.08.2012 22:08, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 8/5/2012 10:10 PM, Kaspar Brand wrote: >> On 05.08.2012 14:38, Guenter Knauf wrote: >>> Am 05.08.2012 10:10, schrieb Kaspar Brand: >>>> 1) use --with-ssl-builddir for linking with the static OpenSSL libraries >>>> in that directory (and ignore --with-ssl in this case) >>> what about splitting into two arguments: >>> --with-ssl-include= >>> --with-ssl-lib= >>> this would be equal to what many other configure also use ... >> >> That's an option, yes, although the way the proposed option would work >> doesn't mirror the typical case of --with-xyz-include/--with-xyz-lib >> (i.e., add those args with -I and -L): "--with-ssl-builddir" forces >> mod_ssl to always be linked with the static libraries in that directory. >> Maybe --with-ssl-static-libdir would be a more appropriate name? > > Why not simply consume the installed openssl.pc?
In this particular case we're talking about using an OpenSSL build directory, i.e. the generated openssl.pc is sitting in a temporary location in that build tree (and when used, would output incorrect includedir/libdir locations). Kaspar
