<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from vpn-144-20.vpn.uva.nl [146.50.144.20] with HTTP/1.1 (POST); Tue,
25 Mar 2008 21:34:32 +0100
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1-rc1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:47:33 -0400, Elisamuel Resto
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I remember talking about this with Jason when the lists changed
> administrators, he pointed out a few things, amongst
> them: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Note that most "considered harmful" articles are rather tongue-in-cheek in
nature.
More seriously, even Roundcube doesn't include such a button to reply to
the mailinglist, so not having a reply-to header means that a lot of people
have to manually check that mails go to the correct address. Reply-all
generates lots of double copies.
I suggest that for pragmatic reasons the reply-to header should be set.
--
-- Andreas [ http://unstable.nl | gopher://unstable.nl ]
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
