On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Benjamin Podszun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:34:32 +0100, Andreas van Cranenburgh > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I suggest that for pragmatic reasons the reply-to header should be set. > > -1 from me. Nothing gained imo, only breaks stuff (like a personal > reply..). I'd rather like it to stay the way it is.
-1 as well. It's good as is. Use "reply to all" instead. Till _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
