On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:34:32 +0100, Andreas van Cranenburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:47:33 -0400, Elisamuel Resto > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I remember talking about this with Jason when the lists changed >> administrators, he pointed out a few things, amongst >> them: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > Note that most "considered harmful" articles are rather tongue-in-cheek in > nature.
Yes, the term "considered harmful" is often overused and exaggerated, agreed. > More seriously, even Roundcube doesn't include such a button to reply to > the mailinglist, so not having a reply-to header means that a lot of > people have to manually check that mails go to the correct address. Reply-all > generates lots of double copies. I'm happy with "Reply" and "Reply all" buttons, but wouldn't mind a "List reply" one for detected/supported mailing lists (list-id set or something). If you like the idea really hard you (and the other supporters) could just set the reply-to themself. The list shouldn't mess with it (this is one reason to keep it that way) and your mails "just work" (tm) the way you like it. > I suggest that for pragmatic reasons the reply-to header should be set. -1 from me. Nothing gained imo, only breaks stuff (like a personal reply..). I'd rather like it to stay the way it is. Regards, Ben _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
