Hi,
On 10/10/14 1:25 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
They should rename going forward.
At some point (probably we could do so now) we will turn on enforcement in
the maven-plugin-plugin.
This will of course piss of a lot of people. Wouldn't it?
There are, of course, several reasons why people can't:
1. Popularity of the old name
That's no reason...a good announcment of the maintainers should
work...and the rules are existing a long time....
2. Technical reasons
What kind of technical reasons ? Just change it...
3. Name collisions
Same as under 1. just make a good announcment of the name change and
that's it...
This is even harder depending how the collisions will happen...with
Apache Maven Plugins ? If yes than it should be changed asap...
Unfortunately i don't see a real problem with this...
etc.
Even if we enforce this, this should not happen before Maven 4 and should be
added to the plugin dev center.
Unfortunately i have a different point of view.....
The web site says:
"..strongly discouraged since it's a reserved naming pattern for
official Apache Maven plugins maintained by the Apache Maven team ..."
We should send a C&D letter if we will become aware of it ....but not
actively looking for such things....
Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Kind regards
Karl-Heinz Marbaise
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
