Am 12/29/16 um 13:49 schrieb Robert Scholte: > My worries are more about: how to manage which issues should be cherry > picked and who decides that list. Otherwise we might end up in the same > situation. E.g. do we have to do a vote on the branch (which might cover > multiple issues but which are related to the same topic) to decide if it > can be merged with the master?
This is what I have in mind. I know my commits. What I would do as soon as master has been reset would be to squash my commits as much as possible and then cast a vote on specific issues (for each single commit to be merged into master) with the exception that no response means +1. So instead of the whole PMC needing to agree, not responding means "+1". That also would mean that if e.g. two PMC members vote -1, all others implicitly have voted +1 if they did not respond otherwise. WDYT? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
