Am 12/31/16 um 03:27 schrieb Christian Schulte: > Am 12/29/16 um 13:49 schrieb Robert Scholte: >> My worries are more about: how to manage which issues should be cherry >> picked and who decides that list. Otherwise we might end up in the same >> situation. E.g. do we have to do a vote on the branch (which might cover >> multiple issues but which are related to the same topic) to decide if it >> can be merged with the master? > > This is what I have in mind. I know my commits. What I would do as soon > as master has been reset would be to squash my commits as much as > possible and then cast a vote on specific issues (for each single commit > to be merged into master) with the exception that no response means +1. > So instead of the whole PMC needing to agree, not responding means "+1". > That also would mean that if e.g. two PMC members vote -1, all others > implicitly have voted +1 if they did not respond otherwise. WDYT? >
Adding to this: I do not have a deep understanding of the Apache way of things. Personally, I do not get the point why the users of the software cannot take part in any of those decisions. I just may not get the point, of course. Citizens are asked to vote on election day, for example. Here it's like a dictatorship of those with the power to do so deciding the future of all others. Don't get me wrong on this please. English is not my native language and I may not have found the proper words here. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
