On 1/21/07, Jeroen Brattinga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I meant that the mina-core jar keeps the ByteBuffer implementation, and -for those that want only to use the Mina ByteBuffer- a separate ByteBuffer jar. But it's not needed for the Mina framework.
It's also a good idea, though I'm not sure Maven can do it for us. By the way, please note this is not a vote. :) Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP key fingerprints: * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
