Hi Jim, I cannot think of any UI work for HA. I'll let Santosh comment for FGS.
Regards Swapnil On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Jim Klucar <klu...@gmail.com> wrote: > any UI or Rest tweaks desired for this? > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Swapnil Daingade < > swapnil.daing...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Just learned from Santosh that my email last night did not make it to the > > mailing list. > > resending... > > > > Regards > > Swapnil > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Swapnil Daingade <swapnil.daing...@gmail.com> > > Date: Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:00 AM > > Subject: Re: Myriad 0.1 release scope > > To: dev@myriad.incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > I think Myriad HA is also in good shape. We discussed work preserving NM > > restart internally and it looks like it is disabled by default in Apache > > Hadoop. > > > > > https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-site/NodeManagerRestart.html > > > > All 3 major distro's seem to have it disabled by default. I think we can > > revisit it in the next Myriad release. > > For the time being we can continue with the NM + Executor merge. It too > has > > been tried out and reviewed by Darin and Santosh. > > > > The current PR we have for Myriad state store implementation should work > > for phase1. > > There is some additional work required for supporting FGS that I am > working > > on. > > Should be able to complete by the time FGS is merged into phase1. > > > > Regards > > Swapnil > > > > > > > > Santosh Marella wrote: > > > > I feel FGS is very close to making it into 0.1. PR 116 addresses moving > to > > hadoop 2.7 and making FGS and CGS coexist. This PR was recently reviewed > by > > Yulia and Darin. Darin had also tried out FGS on hadoop 2.6.x and 2.7.x > > clusters and it seemed to have worked as expected. Unless there are more > > reviews/feedback, it can be merged into issue_14. Once PR 116 is merged > > into issue_14, issue_14 can be merged into phase1. > > > > Thanks, > > Santosh > > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Adam Bordelon <a...@mesosphere.io> > > <a...@mesosphere.io> wrote: > > > > > > > > We do have a JIRA 0.1.0 "fix version" field, but none of our issues use > it > > yet. > > I think the goal was just to take what we have and make it work under > > Apache infrastructure, then vote on that for 0.1.0. > > Although other features like HA or FGS would be great, let's try to get > our > > first Apache release out ASAP. > > We can create 0.1.1 or 0.2.0 fix versions for subsequent releases with > > other issues/features. Roadmap would be great. > > (I'm just summarizing what we discussed a month or two ago. Feel free to > > correct me or disagree with this approach.) > > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Swapnil Daingade < > > swapnil.daing...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > Was wondering what would be the scope for the Myriad 0.1 release. > > It would be nice to have a roadmap page somewhere and target > > features to releases (JIRA 'fix version' field perhaps) > > > > Regards > > Swapnil > > >
