Hello guys, I propose merging FGS into phase1. As I said before, I think it's at a point where the functionality works reasonably well. Any future improvements/fixes/UI changes can be done via separate JIRAs.
Unless there are any major concerns, I'd like to merge FGS into phase1 *EOD Monday* (PDT). Thanks, Santosh On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Santosh Marella <smare...@maprtech.com> wrote: > I feel FGS is very close to making it into 0.1. PR 116 addresses moving to > hadoop 2.7 and making FGS and CGS coexist. This PR was recently reviewed by > Yulia and Darin. Darin had also tried out FGS on hadoop 2.6.x and 2.7.x > clusters and it seemed to have worked as expected. Unless there are more > reviews/feedback, it can be merged into issue_14. Once PR 116 is merged > into issue_14, issue_14 can be merged into phase1. > > Thanks, > Santosh > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Adam Bordelon <a...@mesosphere.io> wrote: > >> We do have a JIRA 0.1.0 "fix version" field, but none of our issues use it >> yet. >> I think the goal was just to take what we have and make it work under >> Apache infrastructure, then vote on that for 0.1.0. >> Although other features like HA or FGS would be great, let's try to get >> our >> first Apache release out ASAP. >> We can create 0.1.1 or 0.2.0 fix versions for subsequent releases with >> other issues/features. Roadmap would be great. >> (I'm just summarizing what we discussed a month or two ago. Feel free to >> correct me or disagree with this approach.) >> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Swapnil Daingade < >> swapnil.daing...@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Was wondering what would be the scope for the Myriad 0.1 release. >> > It would be nice to have a roadmap page somewhere and target >> > features to releases (JIRA 'fix version' field perhaps) >> > >> > Regards >> > Swapnil >> > >> > >
