So I compiled the 2.5 fgs against 2.6 when I was testing. If we abstract this right it may just be an if statement or two. On Aug 7, 2015 6:47 PM, "Santosh Marella" <smare...@maprtech.com> wrote:
> > Myriad code base compiled against hadoop 2.7 should work on hadoop 2.5 > > cluster as long as FGS (i.e. zero profile NM) is not used. > > Verified the above. As long as FGS (zero profile NM) is not used, > Myriad compiled against hadoop 2.7 will work on hadoop 2.5. > > Thanks, > Santosh > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Santosh Marella <smare...@maprtech.com> > wrote: > > > > It will make working on HA easier > > Oh Yes! > > > > > how do we facilitate that? Profiles? > > Profiles might be one way. Currently, FGS is supported for "zero" profile > > only. > > And we have seen there was an API incompatibility from 2.5 to 2.6+ in FGS > > code. > > So, ideally (since I haven't tried it myself), when FGS is merged into > > phase1, > > the Myriad code base compiled against hadoop 2.7 should work on hadoop > 2.5 > > cluster as long as FGS (i.e. zero profile NM) is not used. (I'll try this > > out and > > post back what I find) > > > > However, in the long term we need a mechanism to abstract out the APIs > > that are incompatible across versions. > > > > Thanks, > > Santosh > > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Darin Johnson <dbjohnson1...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> It will make working on HA easier. However, one concern that's been > >> addressed previously is that FGS works for Hadoop 2.6.0+. Do we plan to > >> support 2.5.X (anything lower?) also as Santosh has a way to do that, if > >> so > >> how do we facilitate that? Profiles? > >> > >> Darin > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Santosh Marella <smare...@maprtech.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Hello guys, > >> > > >> > I propose merging FGS into phase1. As I said before, I think it's at a > >> > point where the functionality works reasonably well. > >> > Any future improvements/fixes/UI changes can be done via separate > JIRAs. > >> > > >> > Unless there are any major concerns, I'd like to merge FGS into phase1 > >> *EOD > >> > Monday* (PDT). > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Santosh > >> > > >> > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Santosh Marella < > smare...@maprtech.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > I feel FGS is very close to making it into 0.1. PR 116 addresses > >> moving > >> > to > >> > > hadoop 2.7 and making FGS and CGS coexist. This PR was recently > >> reviewed > >> > by > >> > > Yulia and Darin. Darin had also tried out FGS on hadoop 2.6.x and > >> 2.7.x > >> > > clusters and it seemed to have worked as expected. Unless there are > >> more > >> > > reviews/feedback, it can be merged into issue_14. Once PR 116 is > >> merged > >> > > into issue_14, issue_14 can be merged into phase1. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Santosh > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Adam Bordelon <a...@mesosphere.io> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> We do have a JIRA 0.1.0 "fix version" field, but none of our issues > >> use > >> > it > >> > >> yet. > >> > >> I think the goal was just to take what we have and make it work > under > >> > >> Apache infrastructure, then vote on that for 0.1.0. > >> > >> Although other features like HA or FGS would be great, let's try to > >> get > >> > >> our > >> > >> first Apache release out ASAP. > >> > >> We can create 0.1.1 or 0.2.0 fix versions for subsequent releases > >> with > >> > >> other issues/features. Roadmap would be great. > >> > >> (I'm just summarizing what we discussed a month or two ago. Feel > >> free to > >> > >> correct me or disagree with this approach.) > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Swapnil Daingade < > >> > >> swapnil.daing...@gmail.com > >> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > Hi all, > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Was wondering what would be the scope for the Myriad 0.1 release. > >> > >> > It would be nice to have a roadmap page somewhere and target > >> > >> > features to releases (JIRA 'fix version' field perhaps) > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Regards > >> > >> > Swapnil > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >
