(So if I clone that repo, am I cloning the right one?) On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:43 PM, John Omernik <j...@omernik.com> wrote:
> Ok, I was going off > https://github.com/mesos/myriad/blob/phase1/docs/myriad-configuration.md > > I will try it. > > John > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:40 PM, yuliya Feldman < > yufeld...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > >> You actually do not need to rebuild even today - just keep this file in >> hadoop config directory that is on the classpath: like .../etc/hadoop >> From: John Omernik <j...@omernik.com> >> To: dev@myriad.incubator.apache.org >> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 1:35 PM >> Subject: Re: Myriad 0.1 release scope >> >> On the release scope, will having the myriad configuration file exist >> outside the jar (i.e. you can change configuration without rebuilding) be >> part of the .1 release scope? >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Santosh Marella <smare...@maprtech.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hello All, >> > >> > I've merged the FGS changes into phase1. Built and tested both coarse >> > grained scaling and fine grained scaling, UI on a 4 node cluster. >> > >> > If anyone finds things are not working as expected, please let me know. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Santosh >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Santosh Marella <smare...@maprtech.com >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Hello guys, >> > > >> > > I propose merging FGS into phase1. As I said before, I think it's at a >> > > point where the functionality works reasonably well. >> > > Any future improvements/fixes/UI changes can be done via separate >> JIRAs. >> > > >> > > Unless there are any major concerns, I'd like to merge FGS into phase1 >> > > *EOD Monday* (PDT). >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Santosh >> > > >> > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Santosh Marella < >> smare...@maprtech.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> I feel FGS is very close to making it into 0.1. PR 116 addresses >> moving >> > >> to hadoop 2.7 and making FGS and CGS coexist. This PR was recently >> > reviewed >> > >> by Yulia and Darin. Darin had also tried out FGS on hadoop 2.6.x and >> > 2.7.x >> > >> clusters and it seemed to have worked as expected. Unless there are >> more >> > >> reviews/feedback, it can be merged into issue_14. Once PR 116 is >> merged >> > >> into issue_14, issue_14 can be merged into phase1. >> > >> >> > >> Thanks, >> > >> Santosh >> > >> >> > >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Adam Bordelon <a...@mesosphere.io> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> We do have a JIRA 0.1.0 "fix version" field, but none of our issues >> use >> > >>> it >> > >>> yet. >> > >>> I think the goal was just to take what we have and make it work >> under >> > >>> Apache infrastructure, then vote on that for 0.1.0. >> > >>> Although other features like HA or FGS would be great, let's try to >> get >> > >>> our >> > >>> first Apache release out ASAP. >> > >>> We can create 0.1.1 or 0.2.0 fix versions for subsequent releases >> with >> > >>> other issues/features. Roadmap would be great. >> > >>> (I'm just summarizing what we discussed a month or two ago. Feel >> free >> > to >> > >>> correct me or disagree with this approach.) >> > >>> >> > >>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Swapnil Daingade < >> > >>> swapnil.daing...@gmail.com >> > >>> > wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>> > Hi all, >> > >>> > >> > >>> > Was wondering what would be the scope for the Myriad 0.1 release. >> > >>> > It would be nice to have a roadmap page somewhere and target >> > >>> > features to releases (JIRA 'fix version' field perhaps) >> > >>> > >> > >>> > Regards >> > >>> > Swapnil >> > >>> > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> > >
