> -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> It is not clear to me if you do not understand what was said, or > whether you disagree with what was said. Or maybe a combination of > both? My question is whether the outcome of the vote (Dave wrote: "Do we all agree?"), now need only wait. Or was the question of Dave, not at all meant as a vote? > 1) Treat PrOOoBox as a 3rd party distribution and include it in a page > where we describe other 3rd party distributions. Yes, that's the way I want to go. > 2) (more work) make PrOOoBox be an official product of the project. > If we do that then we can announce it via all the resources we have. That would be good, but that will require a lot of coordination work. At the moment, perhaps even following questions: What content should be on the PrOOo box? e.g. also FireFox? If the PrOOo box would directly associated with AOO, eg on http://www.openoffice.org/de/prooo-box/, it would then also the site www.prooo-box.org give (with exactly the same content), and how would their status? Would then www.prooo-box.org no 3rd party? > Once you make a proposal, then wait 72-hours (lazy consensus) and if > there are no objections, then go ahead and do it. OK. > We don't need to vote. The important thing is that we all understand > the constraints about how we relate to 3rd parties and that we make > this clear on our website. Yes. Greetings, Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
