> On Sep 14, 2016, at 5:28 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Tarballs are at: >> https://github.com/jimjag/dmake/releases >> My goal was to try to combine all the flavors of dmake into one >> "canonical" version we can use. > > Is there a reason for that? >
The only reason I saw was that it was a dependency that we haven't tracked at all (see the req to fix configure.am/in with the correct URL) and was/is easy to lose. There seemed to have been some improvements since 4.12 that also looked like they might have been useful. All in all, have a tarball w/ no real source version control, and a tarball whose location has changed and been lost, up to now, seems like an easy thing to resolve. Hence the repo. > > Our build is designed to succeed based only on resources under control of the > project, namely: the SVN repository; the OOoExtras site; the Extensions site. > Depending on yet another online resource (a personal account on GitHub) seems > an additional issue. > epm is required and not under our control. In fact, epm 4.3 is out and work much better for AOO since it removes the need for the long-since deprecated PackageMaker app and instead uses the official pkgbuild stuff. Part of my configure.in changes (to be submitted to trunk) notices that. Or is this the typical warm and inviting behavior that all "new" AOO contributors are subjected to? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
