>From: "Rahul Akolkar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 6/22/07, Gary VanMatre wrote: > > >From: "Greg Reddin" > > > > > > On 6/22/07, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > > > > > > > > On 6/22/07, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > > > hi, > > > > > > > > > > are there any plans for 1.1.0 release ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > As an aside, IMO its worthwhile to have a v1.0.5 as well so we can > > > > attempt to go GA in the 1.0.x line. Opinions? > > > > > > > For the most part, the trunk and 1_0_x branch are the same. I can only > > think > of one commit that was not made to the both. I'd like to see us move the > trunk > to JSF 1.2 and then we could mix in the annotations as part of the base > libraries. > > > > > shale-dialog has considerable deltas (the helper class, some new > listener methods etc. -- many @since 1.1.0 tags if you dig into the > code). This was under the understanding that no new features went into > the 1.0.x line after v1.0.4. > > If we want to move trunk to JSF 1.2, that should either happen at > v1.1.0 or should wait for the next line of development (v1.2.0) IMO. > Depending on JSF versions and when currently unreleased new features > frum trunk get released, here are the potential release scenarios: > > SCENARIO A: > > 1.0.x --> JSF 1.1, no new features beyond v1.0.4 > 1.1.x --> JSF 1.1, seeded from current trunk > 1.2.x --> JSF 1.2 > > SCENARIO B: > > 1.0.x --> JSF 1.1, no new features beyond v1.0.4 > 1.1.x --> JSF 1.2, seeded from current trunk > > SCENARIO C: > > 1.0.x --> JSF 1.1, merge current deltas (mostly dialog new features) from > trunk in 1.0.x line > 1.1.x --> JSF 1.2, seeded from current trunk > > Preferences? >
I can see how A would provide a good match to JSF but the question is how many new features do we want to target at JSF 1.1 when 1.2 is the new frontier. I'd rather target the trunk at JSF 1.2/ JDK 1.5 so the trunk is always the latest. > -Rahul Gary
