Thanks for your Feedback! i can live with the fact that Shale will get a better chance at the MyFaces project. actually i had a good experience using MyFaces and Shale together. it is a little ironic: "Shale on the search of a new home, From Struts to MyFaces" this will be my next book.
Sam kito99 wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: samju [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 10:23 AM >> To: dev@shale.apache.org >> Subject: Re: MyFaces >> >> >> So Mr. Kito, need a answer. Wich kind of things have changed? Why is it >> so >> quiet around Shale? What is the Problem with Shale? does Shale still a >> modern web application framework? >> >> PL please give a declaration. > > Well, Shale is more of a collection of services for JSF apps as opposed to > a > full-fledged framework. It has a lot of useful features, however, and I > generally recommend it for people for whom JBoss Seam isn't a good fit. > > Regardless, the point is that there's a lot of good code here and very > little activity from the committers (as Gary mentioned). The MyFaces > community is a lot more active, and I think moving Shale there has a > better > chance of ensuring that some of this functionality doesn't get stale. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action > http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and mentoring > http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/MyFaces-tf4643427.html#a13333048 Sent from the Shale - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
