> -----Original Message----- > From: Pavel Savara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 12:15 PM > To: dev@shale.apache.org > Subject: RE: Merging Shale into MyFaces > > >but I'm having a hard time seeing benefits over Facelets and Clay. > > What I see as benefit for tiles is possibility to define another > tiles.xml config which specify what page should be displayed for > different locale. So you don't have only localized messages and text > but complete web page layout event you can serve completely different > web page under the same url for different locale. > Not sure it this is possible in clay or facelets.
In Facelets, this isn't built in, but it'd be pretty easy to implement. > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Reddin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 4:47 PM > To: dev@shale.apache.org > Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces > > > On 10/22/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Tiles works with FreeMarker and Struts 2 too. And sincerely I think > that > > it > > could be used for JSF users, if it only gets more support (don't look > at > > me, > > I don't know anything about JSF :-) ). > > > It could be used, but I'm not sure how practical it is. We've seen > several > users express interest, but I'm having a hard time seeing benefits over > Facelets and Clay. I guess if you're employer-constrained into using > JSP > then Tiles might be a good option. > > Greg
