> > - test-framework: we've long used it in MyFaces, but for recent tests
> > both Matthias and me have used EasyMock, it is somewhat easier to
> > define changing interface behaviour with EasyMock than with static
> > mock-classes. Still, this is valuable, and should be a separate module
> > in the merger.
>
> Could shale-test be enhanced by using EasyMock?

there is JMock support in

-M

> '
> > - validators - no, probably not really
> > - s:token: I'd love to have a generic way of preventing duplicated
> > posts. But I guess this is something that Orchestra could eventually
> > handle?
>
> Honestly, this may be more of a Tomahawk think. Perhaps a specialized form
> component?
>
> > apart from that, I don't know much more about Shale - sorry.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 10/22/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Ok, so what about having a 'myfaces dormant' project where each
> > module gets
> > > added where it seems there is no real maintainer.
> > > This could be a place for abandoned sandbox stuff too.
> > > I know, the word 'maintainer' is not well placed in the context of an
> > apache
> > > community, but in the end I think it would be fair to show to users
> > that no
> > > one is really working on an project.
> > >
> > >
> > > Mario
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: "Grant Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Monday, Okt 22, 2007 6:02 pm
> > > Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
> > > To: Reply-    "MyFaces Development" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
> > "MyFaces
> > > Development" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > Conceptually, I am in favor of a merge. I wouldn't wait for JSF 2.0
> > to do
> > > it, though. +1.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On 10/22/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:At least,
> > 1
> > > year, that is my guess.
> > > >
> > > >So, I agree w/ Kito here
> > > >
> > > >-M
> > > >
> > > >On 10/22/07, Kito D. Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> I don't think that's a good idea, since JSF 2.0 is a year or more
> > > away....
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > >> Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action
> > > >> http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and
> > mentoring
> > > >> http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > > >> > From: Bernhard Slominski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >> > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 8:41 AM
> > > >> > To: 'dev@shale.apache.org'; MyFaces Development
> > > >> > Subject: AW: Merging Shale into MyFaces
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Hi all,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I guess it makes sense, to make the merger a post JSF 2 project.
> > > >> > So all features, which are included in JSF 2 (e.g Remoting)
> > should not
> > > >> > move,
> > > >> > but just stay in Shale.
> > > >> > Also let's see where templating and component development goes
> > before
> > > >> > making
> > > >> > a decision about Clay.
> > > >> > So Shale is then the JSF 1.X add-on framework, when it comes to
> > JSF 2
> > > >> > all
> > > >> > Add-Ons move to MyFaces.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Bernhard
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > >> > > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag
> > > >> > > von Craig
> > > >> > > McClanahan
> > > >> > > Gesendet: Montag, 22. Oktober 2007 01:48
> > > >> > > An: MyFaces Development; Shale Developers List
> > > >> > > Betreff: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > >     * Remoting
> > > >> > > > > Unsure, as most of this can be done with PPR too.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > +1 This is pretty useful and easy to use, and will affect
> > JSF 2.0.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > A secondary benefit is near-zero config for resource access,
> > > >&gt
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org

Reply via email to