Right now, you should continue to use the Shale user's mailing list. The MyFaces merger hasn't happened yet.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and mentoring http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info > -----Original Message----- > From: samju [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 3:54 AM > To: dev@shale.apache.org > Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces > > > Hello!! > > Where do we can get support for Shale?? MyFaces forum? > > thx, Sam > > Rahul Akolkar wrote: > > > > On 10/21/07, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <big-snip/> > >> > >> > > >> > > * Dialog Manager > >> > > * Dialog Manager (Basic Implementation) > >> > > * Dialog Manager (SCXML Implementation) > >> > > The Dialog Manager might be a next step for MyFaces Orchestra. > >> Anyway, > >> > > I > >> > > hope that one of the original developers is still there to help > out > >> > > with > >> > > things. > >> > > >> > +0 I like the idea of integrating this with Orchestra, although > I'm not > >> > convinced that Spring should be a requirement to use this feature. > If > >> that's > >> > the case, you might as well use Spring Web Flow. > >> > >> The thing I like most about Shale Dialogs is that you really can > >> abstract a significant amount of detail behind a common dialog > >> interface, and then pick a back end implementation with varying sets > >> of capabilities (and dependencies). Early on in Orchestra's life, I > >> had suggested to Mario that it would be cool to have an adapter so > you > >> could Orchestra as your dialog implementation :-). > >> > > <snap/> > > > > While I'm on neither of the PMCs, I continue to be interested in > Shale > > dialogs. And as long as I'm around, someone will try to answer user > > queries etc. > > > > -Rahul > > > > > > > >> Longer term, this territory is going to get addressed by Web Beans > >> (JSR-299), which is likely to include all the scope stuff (and more > >> than Dialog has), coupled with annotation based dependency > injection. > >> > >> But I've always felt that support for scopes other than > >> request/session/application *really* belongs in the servlet spec so > >> all Java web technologies can use it ... > > <snip/> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Merging-Shale-into- > MyFaces-tf4664431.html#a13462830 > Sent from the Shale - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
