On 6/2/08, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip/> > > (5) Vote > > Please review these artifacts, signatures and checksums, and vote > whether we should release them as Apache Shale version 1.0.5. > > --8<-------------------------------------------- > [X] +1 (Binding) for PMC members only > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released > ------------------------------------------------ > <snap/>
Sporadically checked a few sums, sigs, manifests, LICENSE / NOTICE files. Tried out the dialog test apps (not to be released, see para below), and also the shale-blank, shale-usecases and shale-clay-usecases apps. The shale-test-* artifacts mentioned earlier in this thread do not contain the LICENSE / NOTICE files and so I think its important we don't release them (as already discussed). Please take care of this when / before you move the staged artifacts. The "New Style Remoting Support" links in shale-usecases app initially 404'd (seemed to work after I tried some other stuff) -- it'd be great if someone can check those so theres no regression (theres also a trace from the "Form completion" Ajax example though it works). I used Tomcat 5.5.17. I'm traveling for a week, starting now, and will have limited email time. -Rahul > A quality vote (per module, where necessary) will be held later on if > this passes. > > Thank you!! > > Greg >
