https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6781
Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2012-04-02 22:55:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > You're right I was wrong, please read / replace "broken spamware" as / with > "spamware is taking advantage of RFC and ...". > > Maybe MULTIPLE_FROM can be combined with a list of User-Agents that allow to > set up multiple emails in From? Or with a list of User-Agents that are known > to > not support such feature? > > Frankly speaking I haven't seen multiple emails in From: up until recent > spamrun. I think this is a question less for RFCs and more for "is it indicative of Spam". So looking at my SPAM that by-passed my filters and using a FAR more simplistic check: I have nothing except email addresses with "[email protected]" <[email protected]> as the grep ^From: | grep -E "@.*@" Check my hand sorted Ham corpus, I have zero hits. Checking my automatic filtered Spam corpus, I also have zero hits. In short, I have zero examples of any r/w cases with multiple emails in the >From header. Not saying it doesn't exist but don't really see that this is going to have a high S/O unless you have a corpus where you are seeing this a lot. regards, KAM -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
