https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6781
--- Comment #11 from Mark Martinec <[email protected]> --- > A message with multiple from entries, no sender header, and non-spammy > content is not a "false positive" as it is an RFC violation and therefore > not a valid message. Seems like the RFC 5322 is inconsistent with itself: section 3.6.2: If the originator of the message can be indicated by a single mailbox and the author and transmitter are identical, the "Sender:" field SHOULD NOT be used. Otherwise, both fields SHOULD appear. section 3.6.: sender ... MUST occur with multi-address from - see 3.6.2 So it's either a SHOULD or a MUST. > Now, as for the misfirings on a character-set-encoded string, that could be > a problem. Maybe we need a "decoded" function, which for non-encoded > strings will be identical to "raw", but for strings starting with > "=charset", it obviously decodes them and performs comparisons thereafter. ...or a change in the behaviour of an :addr modifier, so that it would return all addresses, not just the first. Its current behaviour is probably questionable even when applying to a To or Cc header field. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
