https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6781
--- Comment #10 from D. Stussy <[email protected]> --- RE: Comment #9 - I must disagree: A message with multiple from entries, no sender header, and non-spammy content is not a "false positive" as it is an RFC violation and therefore not a valid message. Although spam is generally about content, I cannot accept that a malformed message is a legitimate message. Such malformations are precisely the target of the rule(set) that we are developing as a result of this bug report. Now, as for the misfirings on a character-set-encoded string, that could be a problem. Maybe we need a "decoded" function, which for non-encoded strings will be identical to "raw", but for strings starting with "=charset", it obviously decodes them and performs comparisons thereafter. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
