2012/9/26 Liviu Nicoara <nikko...@hates.ms>:
> On 9/25/12 7:56 PM, Stefan Teleman (JIRA) wrote:
>>
>>
>>       [
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
>> ]
>
>
> Anybody around here, except Stefan, who has access to a SPARC V8 machine
> updated to the specified kernel update or later, and who is willing to run a
> simple test program? It's a 5 minute job at most.

Please point me to the test program.
P.

>
> Thanks!
>
>>
>> Stefan Teleman closed STDCXX-1066.
>> ----------------------------------
>>
>>      Resolution: Won't Fix
>>
>> Bug will not be fixed upstream. It is fixed in the Solaris releases.
>>
>>> SPARCV8 requires pthread_mutex_t and pthread_cond_t to be aligned on an
>>> 8-byte boundary
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>                  Key: STDCXX-1066
>>>                  URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-1066
>>>              Project: C++ Standard Library
>>>           Issue Type: Bug
>>>           Components: Thread Safety
>>>     Affects Versions: 4.2.1, 4.2.2, 4.2.x, 4.3.x
>>>          Environment: Solaris 10 Update 6 or later on SPARCV8 [32-bit]
>>> Defect is compiler-independent - in reality it only affects Sun Studio
>>> and GCC.
>>>             Reporter: Stefan Teleman
>>>               Labels: features, runtime, threads
>>>              Fix For: 4.2.2, 4.2.x, 4.3.x
>>>
>>>          Attachments: _config-gcc.h.stdcxx-1066.patch,
>>> _config-sunpro.h.stdcxx-1066.patch, ctype.cpp.stdcxx-1066.patch,
>>> exception.cpp.stdcxx-1066.patch, ios.cpp.stdcxx-1066.patch,
>>> iostream.cpp.stdcxx-1066.patch, iostream.stdcxx-1066.patch,
>>> locale_body.cpp.stdcxx-1066.patch, locale_classic.cpp.stdcxx-1066.patch,
>>> messages.cpp.stdcxx-1066.patch, _mutex.h.stdcxx-1066.patch,
>>> time_put.cpp.stdcxx-1066.patch, use_facet.h.stdcxx-1066.patch
>>>
>>>
>>> Starting with Solaris 10 Update 6, on SPARCV8, pthread_mutex_t and
>>> pthread_cond_t MUST be aligned on an 8-byte boundary. Misaligned access will
>>> result in either SEGV or SIGBUS.
>>> There are numerous places in the multi-threaded version of stdcxx where
>>> pthread_mutex_t and/or pthread_cond_t types are contained within an union,
>>> but with an enforced alignment different than 8. All these instances must be
>>> corrected, and #ifdef-guarded for SPARCV8.
>>> Patches to follow shortly, this is just opening the issue.
>>> Warning: the patchset resolving this issue is very large, and it affects
>>> a large number of files.
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
>> administrators
>> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>
>

Reply via email to