On 09/27/12 07:15, Pavel Heimlich, a.k.a. hajma wrote:
2012/9/26 Liviu Nicoara <nikko...@hates.ms>:
On 09/26/12 05:49, Pavel Heimlich, a.k.a. hajma wrote:

2012/9/26 Liviu Nicoara <nikko...@hates.ms>:

On 9/25/12 7:56 PM, Stefan Teleman (JIRA) wrote:



        [

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]



Anybody around here, except Stefan, who has access to a SPARC V8 machine
updated to the specified kernel update or later, and who is willing to
run a
simple test program? It's a 5 minute job at most.


Please point me to the test program.


Hi Pavel,

I attached it. IIRC Solaris had both Solaris threads API and a POSIX threads
API on top of it. Could you please give it a run with MUTEX defined to both
mutex_t and pthread_mutex_t? Might need to tweak the includes.

Here it is, the define seems to make no difference.
BTW I'm not sure about the bug description, was Solaris 10 ever
supported on a sparcv8? I ran it on the crappiest machine I could
find, but all that is sparcv9.


Sun Blade 1000 - UltraSPARC-III+(sparcv9), running Solaris 10u9
bash-3.00# /opt/SUNWspro/bin/CC a.cpp
bash-3.00# ./a.out
24
ffbffcd8 ffbffcf0 ffbffd08 ffbffd20 ffbffd38 ffbffd50 ffbffd68 ffbffd80
ffbffbe0 ffbffc00 ffbffc20 ffbffc40 ffbffc60 ffbffc80 ffbffca0 ffbffcc0
bash-3.00# /opt/SUNWspro/bin/CC -xarch=v8 ./a.cpp
bash-3.00# ./a.out
24
ffbffcd8 ffbffcf0 ffbffd08 ffbffd20 ffbffd38 ffbffd50 ffbffd68 ffbffd80
ffbffbe0 ffbffc00 ffbffc20 ffbffc40 ffbffc60 ffbffc80 ffbffca0 ffbffcc0
bash-3.00# vi a.cpp (<--- pthread_mutex_t)
bash-3.00# /opt/SUNWspro/bin/CC a.cpp
bash-3.00# ./a.out
24
ffbffcd8 ffbffcf0 ffbffd08 ffbffd20 ffbffd38 ffbffd50 ffbffd68 ffbffd80
ffbffbe0 ffbffc00 ffbffc20 ffbffc40 ffbffc60 ffbffc80 ffbffca0 ffbffcc0
bash-3.00# /opt/SUNWspro/bin/CC -xarch=v8 ./a.cpp
bash-3.00# ./a.out
24
ffbffcd8 ffbffcf0 ffbffd08 ffbffd20 ffbffd38 ffbffd50 ffbffd68 ffbffd80
ffbffbe0 ffbffc00 ffbffc20 ffbffc40 ffbffc60 ffbffc80 ffbffca0 ffbffcc0

HTH

Very much appreciated.

Liviu

Reply via email to