2012/9/26 Liviu Nicoara <nikko...@hates.ms>:
> On 09/26/12 05:49, Pavel Heimlich, a.k.a. hajma wrote:
>>
>> 2012/9/26 Liviu Nicoara <nikko...@hates.ms>:
>>>
>>> On 9/25/12 7:56 PM, Stefan Teleman (JIRA) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        [
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
>>>> ]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Anybody around here, except Stefan, who has access to a SPARC V8 machine
>>> updated to the specified kernel update or later, and who is willing to
>>> run a
>>> simple test program? It's a 5 minute job at most.
>>
>>
>> Please point me to the test program.
>
>
> Hi Pavel,
>
> I attached it. IIRC Solaris had both Solaris threads API and a POSIX threads
> API on top of it. Could you please give it a run with MUTEX defined to both
> mutex_t and pthread_mutex_t? Might need to tweak the includes.

Here it is, the define seems to make no difference.
BTW I'm not sure about the bug description, was Solaris 10 ever
supported on a sparcv8? I ran it on the crappiest machine I could
find, but all that is sparcv9.


Sun Blade 1000 - UltraSPARC-III+(sparcv9), running Solaris 10u9
bash-3.00# /opt/SUNWspro/bin/CC a.cpp
bash-3.00# ./a.out
24
ffbffcd8 ffbffcf0 ffbffd08 ffbffd20 ffbffd38 ffbffd50 ffbffd68 ffbffd80
ffbffbe0 ffbffc00 ffbffc20 ffbffc40 ffbffc60 ffbffc80 ffbffca0 ffbffcc0
bash-3.00# /opt/SUNWspro/bin/CC -xarch=v8 ./a.cpp
bash-3.00# ./a.out
24
ffbffcd8 ffbffcf0 ffbffd08 ffbffd20 ffbffd38 ffbffd50 ffbffd68 ffbffd80
ffbffbe0 ffbffc00 ffbffc20 ffbffc40 ffbffc60 ffbffc80 ffbffca0 ffbffcc0
bash-3.00# vi a.cpp (<--- pthread_mutex_t)
bash-3.00# /opt/SUNWspro/bin/CC a.cpp
bash-3.00# ./a.out
24
ffbffcd8 ffbffcf0 ffbffd08 ffbffd20 ffbffd38 ffbffd50 ffbffd68 ffbffd80
ffbffbe0 ffbffc00 ffbffc20 ffbffc40 ffbffc60 ffbffc80 ffbffca0 ffbffcc0
bash-3.00# /opt/SUNWspro/bin/CC -xarch=v8 ./a.cpp
bash-3.00# ./a.out
24
ffbffcd8 ffbffcf0 ffbffd08 ffbffd20 ffbffd38 ffbffd50 ffbffd68 ffbffd80
ffbffbe0 ffbffc00 ffbffc20 ffbffc40 ffbffc60 ffbffc80 ffbffca0 ffbffcc0

HTH

P.

>
> Thanks a bunch!
>
> Liviu
>

Reply via email to