Thanks for pointing this out (and also Kunal Parikh) - I've updated this in CVS.
Having said that, I'm not sure it makes any difference. I was under the impression that these URI's should point to a publicly available copy of the tld and but there aren't copies either on struts.apache.org or jakarata.apache.org/struts. Anyone know if this is an issue? Niall ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:57 AM Subject: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?) > I saw in CVS, > > that URI for Struts-Faces points > also to Jakarta: > <uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-faces</uri> > > > @struts-el: > only tiles-el points to jakarta > (in Struts 1.2.3) > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-bean-el</uri> > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-html-el</uri> > <uri>http://struts.apache.org/tags-logic-el</uri> > <uri>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el</uri> > > Regards, > Matthias > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kunal Parikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:15 AM > > To: Struts Developers List > > Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water? > > > > > > The taglib URI for struts-el is > > http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el > > > > Should this URI really be http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles-el > > > > Note: the non-el version seems to be more in line with the > > other taglib URIs http://struts.apache.org/tags-tiles > > > > HTH, > > > > Kunal > > > > > > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > > > >Martin, > > > > > >I tested out the Struts 1.2.3 binary distribution you > > uploaded. The JDK > > >issue is resolved but the wrong version of the validator jar > > is still > > >being shipped. Now though its more consistent because the "lib" > > >distribution also has the wrong jar as well :-) > > > > > >The disappointing thing from my point of view was that I put a > > >checklist for testing various JDK/Tomcat flavours in the > > Struts 1.2.2 > > >release plan - but it was removed. If they had been left in the plan > > >then the JDK issues would have been caught. > > > > > >I've set up a new plan for Struts 1.2.3 on the wiki: > > > > > >http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123 > > > > > >Niall > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:28 AM > > >Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 05:16:44 +0100, Niall Pemberton > > >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>>I've just got round to testing Struts 1.2.2 and found the following > > >>> > > >>> > > >major > > > > > > > > >>>problems: > > >>> > > >>>* The binary distribution contains the wrong version of commons > > >>> > > >>> > > >validator > > > > > > > > >>>jar (the lib distribution seems to have the right one). > > >>> > > >>> > > >>This leads me to believe that the binary and lib distros come from > > >>different builds, which seems pretty odd. The 'release' > > target builds > > >>everything at once. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>* Struts 1.2.2 is incompatible with JDK 1.3 because it uses > > >>>Boolean.valueOf(boolean) introduced in JDK 1.4 > > >>> > > >>> > > >>This was my fault for doing what FindBugs told me. ;-{ Pity nobody > > >>caught it before 1.2.2 went out. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>Also this distribution has been built/packaged differently to > > >>>previous releases and IMO we should be doing things consistently: > > >>> > > >>>* The binary distribution zip file explodes to > > >>> > > >>> > > >jakarta-struts-1.2.2/dist/ > > > > > > > > >>>directory rather than just jakarta-struts-1.2.2/ > > >>>* The source distribution zip file explodes to jakarta-struts > > >>>directory rather than jakarta-struts-1.2.2-src > > >>>* The source distribution contains all the CVS directories > > and files > > >>> > > >>> > > >>This is very strange. I just ran 'ant release' on my local > > system, and > > >>it worked just fine, creating all of the uploads correctly. > > I see none > > >>of the above issues. Perhaps James built the distros some > > other way? > > >>Not sure. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>James has just fixed the JDK 1.3 incompatibilities in CVS > > but I would > > >>> > > >>> > > >say we > > > > > > > > >>>need to downgrade the 1.2.2 version from a GA quality > > release and cut > > >>>a > > >>> > > >>> > > >new > > > > > > > > >>>one. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>Yes indeed. I've updated the build version, rolled a new release > > >>distribution, and am in the process of uploading it to > > cvs.apache.org. > > >>I have not tested it yet, and have not signed it, but if > > people have > > >>the chance to try it out, that would be very helpful. > > >> > > >>-- > > >>Martin Cooper > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>Niall > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
