God yes, Don. Please don't let them go nuts again. Here you are in the reach of sanity. Stay the course!
On 6/28/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm against "official" code names. We have had enough confusion in Struts with different names meaning different things, and we shouldn't pile on more names. If folks want to off-hand use code names, that's fine, but to have them used in code or documentation is too far. Version 1 and 2 are simple enough. Don Ted Husted wrote: > On 6/28/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Also, hoping not to hijaack this thread I would suggest coming up with >> codenames for 1.x and 2.x codebases. > > If we were to do that, the obvious choices would be Classic for 1.x > and Action for 2.x. > > -Ted. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
