On Fri, 2016-11-11 at 19:19 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> > wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org> > > wrote: > > > My $0.02 is that none of the reasons we requested the blocker criterion > > > have changed. Dual boot with macOS is very important to attracting new > > > users -- we're explicitly targeting macOS users, that's the user group > > > where we think we have real potential for significant growth -- and I > > > continue to prefer we block the release indefinitely if it's not > > > working. We can't afford for our next Ars review to say "the installer > > > is broken, try again next year." > > > > Then we, as a project, need to back that up with sufficient hardware > > and test resources. Otherwise it is nothing more than a wish and will > > continue to lead to problems like this. > > And multi boot issues, which can be quite complex and nuanced, should > then I believe also be a beta blocker (or at least well tested in the > lead up to beta) to ensure issues get enough attention early enough in > the release so as to not block GA.
The question of how early we should test things (ideally we should test everything all the time, but you know how that goes) is really quite separate from the question of which release they should block. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
