On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 06:06:31PM +0100, Grzegorz Nieweglowski wrote: >Someone with flexperience would be needed... > >On my config this does nicely: > >--- xc/programs/twm/lex.c 2003-12-10 17:10:27.000000000 +0100 >+++ xc/programs/twm/lex.c.new 2003-12-10 17:10:47.000000000 +0100 >@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ > > /* flex integer type definitions */ > >+int yy_prev_more_offset; >+ > #ifndef FLEXINT_H > #define FLEXINT_H > >But it's just a quick&dirty hack if someone (like me) is just interested >in getting a XFree86 release to compile.
I just looked at this again. lex.c is generated by flex, so patching it won't work. Other versions of flex put the following in the generated lex.c: static int yy_prev_more_offset = 0; Even trying to work around it by adding something like the above to lex.l would break other builds. >I looked a bit at it, and it seems that flex, at least my flex-2.5.31, >uses a /usr/include/FlexLexer.h header. I guess this header needs to be >included in every flexed C source. However, greping twm for "FlexLexer" >yields no results. > >But twm/lex.c already includes many, many definitions from FlexLexer.h >(some are still missing, like yy_prev_more_offset). I don't know the They are there because flex puts them in the .c file it generates. It's a flex bug that it is not also putting in the definition for yy_prev_more_offset. I don't know if this has been fixed in a newer version of flex yet. David -- David Dawes developer/release engineer The XFree86 Project www.XFree86.org/~dawes _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
