On 11/02/11 14:56, ext Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Wednesday 02 November 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> that idea is a non-starter. >> it starts with dependencies. > > What problems do you see there ? > the way you express them. -Lfoo/bar -lbaz definitely doesn't cut it, and neither does foo/bar/libbaz.so. you need abstract dependencies, but that depends on the build/packaging system again.
>> then, how do you define "build >> configuration" in a build system agnostic way? zero chance. > > At least for Windows it should be clear. There are debug and non-debug builds, > which are AFAIK relatively clear separated. > yes, and release_with_debuginfo, and custom and whatever. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
