On Wednesday 02 November 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On 11/02/11 14:56, ext Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Wednesday 02 November 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > >> that idea is a non-starter. > >> it starts with dependencies. > > > > What problems do you see there ? > > the way you express them. -Lfoo/bar -lbaz definitely doesn't cut it,
Yes. > and neither does foo/bar/libbaz.so. Why ? > you need abstract dependencies, but that > depends on the build/packaging system again. > > >> then, how do you define "build > >> configuration" in a build system agnostic way? zero chance. > > > > At least for Windows it should be clear. There are debug and non-debug > > builds, which are AFAIK relatively clear separated. > > yes, and release_with_debuginfo, and custom and whatever. I don't see a problem there. Alex _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
