On 11/03/11 19:44, ext Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Wednesday 02 November 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> and neither does foo/bar/libbaz.so. > > Why ? > it's not abstract. it does in no way refer to the packages it depends on in turn. you can only make cumulative command lines.
>> you need abstract dependencies, but that >> depends on the build/packaging system again. >>>> then, how do you define "build >>>> configuration" in a build system agnostic way? zero chance. >>> >>> At least for Windows it should be clear. There are debug and non-debug >>> builds, which are AFAIK relatively clear separated. >> >> yes, and release_with_debuginfo, and custom and whatever. > > I don't see a problem there. > well, i do. lumping together two types of release builds into an arbitrary "release" category doesn't really cut it. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
