John Thompson wrote: > On 2009-02-16, Twayne <t...@twaynesdomain.com> wrote: > >> I'm using copy/paste. If it weren't that Word did such a good job >> (which I want to wean myself from) and OO.o such a bad job, I guess >> I'd just shrug it off. I was hoping this would be one of those >> "Just go to ... and ... and you'll be all set, dummy" type answers. >> It takes a little experimenting but if I copy/paste smaller pieces >> of the pages, sort of a subject at a time, then I can sometimes >> succeed in getting a useful document but not always. And how >> little/much to copy at a time is always a crapshoot. >> I've studied the source code of a few of the problem type pages, >> usually Tech Support related pages, but haven't been able to reliably >> attribute it to any specific thing in the source. At one piont I >> thought maybe div tags, or possibly PHP nuances, but no luck tying >> them to anything in the files displays. Obviously it's in the way the >> programs treat HTML and probably the invisible characters that come >> along with such a copy, but I can't pin anything down. > > Are the pages you are pasting into OOo W3C compliant, or do they > contain proprietary markup of some kind?
No idea. I doubt many sites are W3C compliant actually. What's the point? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org
