Alright, it make sense to fix it at least for the 2.6 series, I have added a unit test with your change in the ticket, and it seems to fix the bug on my platform (Mac OS X)
Can you check on your platform that this test brakes when the fix is not done ? and passes when the fix is done ? Thanks Tarek On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:14 PM, anatoly techtonik <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Tarek Ziadé <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Does anybody have time to commit a trivial fix from >>> http://bugs.python.org/issue1885 ? >>> The issue was closed as duplicate by mistake and I do not have >>> privileges to reopen it a new, so I am afraid it will be lost again. >> >> It has been linked to the other so it won't be lost don't worry, >> I will review the various patches in the two tickets this week and work on >> them, >> > > Great! The link should be broken. These issues are close, but > unrelated. The 1885 is about "tar" file being overwritten and removed > when several sdist archives are created at once. The 1886 is about > using tarfile module to create these archives. > > The newest patch in superseder issue 1886 doesn't cover case for 1885 anymore. > > -- > --anatoly t. > -- Tarek Ziadé | Association AfPy | www.afpy.org Blog FR | http://programmation-python.org Blog EN | http://tarekziade.wordpress.com/ _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
